Apple AirTag vs. Android Chipolo: Which Device Tracker Reigns Supreme?
,
by Unboxify,
3 min reading time
Apple vs. Android: The Ultimate Device Tracking Battle 🏆🔍
Introduction to the Battle of Device Trackers 🧐
Apple versus Android is a timeless debate, but today, we're putting them to the test in a unique way: device tracking. Both platforms offer solutions for finding lost items, and we're diving deep into which one comes out on top.
We tested the Chipolo One Point on Android's Find My Device Network against Apple's AirTag on Find My. The battleground: P39 in San Francisco, a bustling tourist hotspot. Let's see how they performed.
The Contenders: Chipolo One Point vs. AirTag 📱🔄
On Team Android: The Chipolo One Point, one of the first trackers to utilize Android's new Find My Device Network.
On Team Apple: The tried-and-true AirTag, well-regarded for its reliability.
Setting Up the Test 🚀
Our producer placed both trackers on a keychain and strategically "lost" them in P39. We then used our phones to determine which tracker we could find first and most easily.
The Process: How We Tested Them 🧪🕵️♀️
Step 1: Mark both devices as lost using their respective apps.
Step 2: Start a stopwatch to measure the time taken to find each device.
Step 3: Analyze the notifications and locate the devices using the apps.
Marking Devices as Lost 📲🚨
Both apps offered similar functionalities:
Notification when found.
Option to display contact information.
After marking both devices as lost, the race began.
First Results: AirTag Takes the Lead 📈⌚
Within 4 minutes and 45 seconds, we received the first notification: the AirTag was found. Meanwhile, the Chipolo tracker had still not been located.
Understanding How These Networks Work 🧠💼
Both Android and Apple use a crowd-sourced platform to locate lost items. Here are three key functionalities they share:
Mark items as lost.
Play a sound to locate nearby items.
Share items with friends or family.
Setting up each tracker was straightforward: bring an AirTag near an iPhone or press the Chipolo tracker to pair with an Android device.
Technological Differences 📡🔬
Three key differences between the two platforms:
Chipolo One Point: Uses only Bluetooth.
AirTag: Utilizes Bluetooth and Ultra-Wideband (UWB) for precise location.
Separation Alerts: Available on AirTag, absent on Chipolo One Point.
The Comparative Results: Speed and Efficiency 🏃♂️💨
After 30 minutes, we hadn't received any notification from the Chipolo tracker. In contrast, we had already received multiple notifications from the AirTag, confirming its location.
Locating Devices: Step-by-Step 🧭🔎
Using the AirTag: Located through Find My more easily. The app provided precise directions.
Using the Chipolo: Required more effort. Eventually, its loud sound helped to locate it.
Insights and Observations 🧩📊
Despite the AirTag being quicker to notify its location, the Chipolo tracker had a significantly louder sound, aiding in its discovery once nearby.
Network Differences 📱🌍
Apple's Find My Network needs just one iPhone to determine the item's location, while Android's network typically requires multiple phones. However, Android offers a setting to use fewer devices for triangulation, particularly useful in low-traffic areas.
Privacy Concerns 🔒🕵️
Both networks have provisions to alert users if an unknown tracker is following them:
Notify users of unknown trackers nearby.
Ensure user location is not misused.
While these provisions ease privacy concerns, there are deeper technical details worth exploring in another post.
Future Comparisons and Possible Improvements 🚀🗺
Should I test these trackers in different environments, like international travel with luggage? Leave your thoughts for future experiments.
Final Verdict: Which One Wins? 🏆📱
In this test, Apple’s AirTag emerged as the victor due to its faster and more reliable location tracking. However, the loud volume of the Chipolo tracker is a noteworthy advantage. Both trackers have their strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice may depend on your specific needs and environment.
End of breakdown.